Evidentialism, Stubborn Counterevidence and Horrendous Evils

نویسندگان

چکیده

Dormandy argues that stubborn counterevidence provides a reason for Evidentialists to form negative beliefs about God. Focusing on ‘horrendous evils’ as kind of counterevidence, I discuss two possible interpretations Dormandy’s account (a stronger and weaker view). Against the view, consider case Committed Theistic Evidentialist, is, an evidentialist who possesses defeater belief against horrendous evils. argue it would be improbable she God basis evils alone. response Evidentialist towards evils, arguing her, ‘honesty’, which results in psychological struggle, is excellent-making property her faith.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A New Argument for Evidentialism

When we deliberate whether to believe some proposition, we feel immediately compelled to look for evidence of its truth. Philosophers have labelled this feature of doxastic deliberation ‘transparency’. I argue that resolving the disagreement in the ethics of belief between evidentialists and pragmatists turns on the correct explanation of transparency. My hypothesis is that it reflects a concep...

متن کامل

Foundational Evidentialism and the Problem of Scatter

a 3 : 2 pp. 89 – 106, 2007 FOUNDATIONAL EVIDENTIALISM AND THE PROBLEM OF SCATTER

متن کامل

Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Sensory neurons gather evidence in favor of the specific stimuli to which they are tuned, but they could improve their sensitivity by also taking counterevidence into account. The Bours-Lankheet model for motion detection uses counterevidence that relies on a specific combination of the ON and OFF channels in the early visual system. Specifically, the model detects pairs of flashes that occur s...

متن کامل

Social evils, poverty & health.

There is a close association between social circumstances and health. In India, there is a significant burden of both communicable and non communicable diseases. Risk factors responsible for these conditions are underweight, unsafe sex, unsafe water, poor sanitation and hygiene, indoor smoke pollution, zinc, iron and vitamin A deficiency, tobacco use, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol. ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Australasian philosophical review

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2474-0519', '2474-0500']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2021.2000184